President Joe Biden announced Thursday $3 billion toward identifying and replacing theĀ nationā€™s unsafeĀ leadĀ pipes,Ā a long-sought move to improve public health and clean drinking waterĀ that will be paidĀ for by the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law.

Biden unveiled the new fundingĀ in North Carolina, a battleground state Democrats have lost to Donald Trump in the past two presidential electionsĀ but are feeling more bullish toward due to an abortion measure on the stateā€™s ballot this November.

ā€¦

The Environmental Protection Agency will invest $3 billion in theĀ leadĀ pipe effort annually through 2026, Administrator Michael Regan told reporters. He said that nearly 50% of the funding will go to disadvantaged communities ā€“ and a fact sheet from the Biden administration noted that ā€œlead exposure disproportionately affects communities of color and low-income families.ā€

  • Alexstarfire@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    Ā·
    7 months ago

    I donā€™t see how a homeowner could affect pipes upstream like that. I have been under the assumption they are talking about replacing city/count/state pipes and not pipes that landowners are responsible for. The article doesnā€™t state either way.

    And there is no guarantee shit wonā€™t get fucked up. But actually listening to people when they say what you want to do will fuck up the pipes sure helps. So, the opposite of what Flint did.

    • maniclucky@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      Ā·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      The first time I saw the argument, it was in relation to pipes in oneā€™s home and Iā€™m not an expert on plumbing. I just felt the idea of ā€œleave it alone and itā€™ll be fineā€ is a really bad one and that it should be pushed back. I did acknowledge municipal pipes a bit, but my argument could use refinement.