Maryam Alwan figured the worst was over after New York City police in riot gear arrested her and other protesters on the Columbia University campus, loaded them onto buses and held them in custody for hours.

But the next evening, the college junior received an email from the university. Alwan and other students were being suspended after their arrests at the “ Gaza Solidarity Encampment,” a tactic colleges across the country have deployed to calm growing campus protests against the Israel-Hamas war.

The students’ plight has become a central part of protests, with students and a growing number of faculty demanding their amnesty. At issue is whether universities and law enforcement will clear the charges and withhold other consequences, or whether the suspensions and legal records will follow students into their adult lives.

    • Wrench@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      6 months ago

      No, it is not. It is the accurate term describing the legal justification that the police need to legally remove the protestors from the premises.

      So many of the replies around this topic live in the clouds. There’s a reason protestors are being forcibly removed. People should understand the nuances of free speech and freedom of assembly. Choosing to disobey is taking on risk to your well-being.

      These are facts. This is not commentary on whether the protestors are “right” or “wrong”. But we should all know the risks they are taking for doing so, and understand when the universities and police are actually overstepping their authority.

      • Jtotheb@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        You’re replying to people who can’t believe the injustice of these laws by explaining that the laws are legal. No consensus will be reached; these are two completely different perspectives. Personally, I think laws, being a made up construct, should generally promote positive behavior like stopping genocide, so I easily side with the protesters and commenters here expressing indignation alongside them.

        The legality argument also ignores the police tradition of breaking the law while shutting down protests just because they can get away with it.

        • Wrench@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          The legality argument also ignores the police tradition of breaking the law while shutting down protests just because they can get away with it.

          And that’s precisely why it is so important to keep the legality of specific actions in mind while evaluating the actions of both the protestors, and the police, while having the conversation on protests and the responses such as these.

          This conversation is the result of a direct reply to yet another comment indicating a lack of understanding of what is legal when protesting in the USA.

          The morality of both the protestors and the authorities is far more subjective. But I keep seeing the same basic question “I thought it was legal to protest in the USA, how can they arrest them?”, so clarifying the boundaries of your rights is a good starting point, IMO. And frankly, bears repeating due to how frequently this is misunderstood and misrepresented.