Supreme Court JusticeĀ Clarence Thomas, 75, sparked raised eyebrows over his whereabouts when he was absent during oral arguments on Monday, and the Court provided no explanation.

Chief JusticeĀ John RobertsĀ addressed Thomasā€™ lack of presence, according toĀ NBCĀ Newsā€™ Lawrence Hurley, saying that Thomas ā€œis not on the bench todayā€ but would ā€œparticipate fullyā€ in the two cases being argued based on the briefs and transcripts.

ā€œContext that may or may not be helpful: In the recent past, Justice Thomas phoned into oral arguments when he couldnā€™t attend in person, allowing him to ask questions remotely. He isnā€™t doing so this time,ā€Ā wroteĀ Slate reporter Mark Joseph Stern on X, formerlyĀ Twitter.

  • macarthur_park@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    51
    Ā·
    5 months ago

    Nah, democrats have a majority in the senate and republicans removed the ability to filibuster Supreme Court confirmations in order to seat Gorsuch. The 60 vote requirement was still in place in 2016 when democrats tried to fill scaliaā€™s seat, and enough democrats were unwilling to change the rules to remove that requirement. Now that itā€™s gone there shouldnā€™t be any issue confirming a new justice.