A judge in Washington state has blocked video evidence that’s been “AI-enhanced” from being submitted in a triple murder trial. And that’s a good thing, given the fact that too many people seem to think applying an AI filter can give them access to secret visual data.

  • Gabu@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    18
    ·
    7 months ago

    Tell me you don’t know shit about AI without telling me you don’t know shit. You can easily reproduce the exact same image by defining the starting seed and constraining the network to a specific sequence of operations.

    • Natanael@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      7 months ago

      But if you don’t do that then the ML engine doesn’t have the introspective capability to realize it failed to recreate an image

      • Gabu@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        13
        ·
        7 months ago

        And if you take your eyes off of their sockets you can no longer see. That’s a meaningless statement.

        • blind3rdeye@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          7 months ago

          The point is that the AI ‘enhanced’ photos have nice clear details that are randomly produced, and thus should not be relied on. Are you suggesting that we can work around that problem by choosing a random seed manually? Do you think that solves the problem?