• hemko@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      12
      ·
      8 months ago

      You really don’t get it? Trust is a problem. Anyone, or anything, can and will fail or be compromised.

      • vrighter@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        so I put my trust in software instead. And by extension its developers. You’re saying of all people, we should trust some programmers above all else. You know, the “move fast and break things” guys.

        As a programmer myself, this thought is both terrifying and hilarious.

        • QuaternionsRock@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          8 months ago

          As a fellow programmer: what kind of doomer take is this? I don’t have any opinion on the efficacy of blockchain technology, but all of us put an immeasurable amount of trust in software every single day. And it’s not like current banking practices are different in this regard, either: blockchain tech requires faith in the software implementation, while contemporary banking requires faith in banks and the software they use (including a borderline unmaintainable COBOL stack, from what I’ve heard).

          • vrighter@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            8 months ago

            because problems in the bank’s software are the bank’s responsibility. If they lose my money, it’s their responsibility to get it back. Cryptocurrencies are the exact opposite, by design. If you’re fucked, you’ee fucked. unless of course half the participants decide to fork, half don’t and you end up with two “currencies” out of thin air.

          • nom345@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            8 months ago

            Banks and firms that uses their services are audited thoug. It is not blind trust. And regadress the tech used there would sitll be audits.

            • QuaternionsRock@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              8 months ago

              Agreed, audits are beneficial in virtually every situation. I just think that, of all the well-formed arguments to be made against cryptocurrencies (especially PoW coins), the fact that it is software isn’t one of them. In my opinion, fueling distrust of software in general is ill-advised.

              • nom345@sopuli.xyz
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                8 months ago

                The distruss to software is not against all software. Blockchains are usually advertised as trustless, so the argument against that has to be made as you have to trust the devs. The trustless argument is weak on other fronts also, but this is one side of the issue.

      • Natanael@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        8 months ago

        Blockchains is a tool for moving trust around in a decentralized network, not a tool for removing it.