• Liz@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    8 months ago

    You’re never going to eliminate gerrymandering without switching to proportional representation. I prefer to use Sequential Proportional Approval Voting, which is just Approval Voting with extra steps.

    My two suggestions for OP are:

    1. Simplify and focus the list. It’s too long and touches too many different topics. Also, when you do have a full list with every topic, separate them by category.

    2. As stated above, use Approval Voting and Proportional Representation.

    • pjwestin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      This is very interesting, but I’m struggling to see how it would work within our current system of single-district representatives. Would Congressional Districts be abolished, and each state pick their allocated Congressmen through Approval Voting? I also don’t see what benefits Approval Voting has over Rank Choice Voting other than simplicity.

      • Liz@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        There’s plenty of ways to do it. The simplest would be to quintuple the size of the house and elect five winners to every district. Literally nothing else would have to change. Five member districts are considered the smallest that are functionally immune to gerrymandering efforts.

        A more reasonable suggestion is to start implementing these reforms on the state and local level, where referendums are possible and you have an easier time building a big enough organization to actually get shit done.

        As for Approval vs RCV, the simplest answer is that they usually agree on the results [all the way down the line]https://electionscience.org/commentary-analysis/super-tuesday-deep-voting-methods-dive/), but approval is simpler and easier in every respect. Both systems tend to produce a candidate support graph that looks like exponential decay in real life. The complicated answer gets into voting theory/math and all sorts of technical criterion. While I think those arguments are valid, most poling and real world data seem to show that basically anything other than “choose one” is good enough, so I prefer the method that is easiest to explain to voters and hardest for candidates to claim shenanigans.

        • pjwestin@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          Interesting, I’ve never heard about this system before, it definitely sounds interesting. I think this will be my next rabbit hole, thanks for sharing!