• Maggoty@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    The Constitution is meant to be read in plain text. The hunting for extra definitions and meanings in and of itself destroys the legitimacy of this ruling.

    • oxjox@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      That’s funny because you would have to hunt for extra definitions to find something other than what the court ruled. This was a pretty cut and dry case.

      Regardless, to claim the constitution is meant to be read “in plain text” is laughable. And to presume you know more about the constitution than nine Supreme Court justices in agreement on this matter is just embarrassing for you.

      • Maggoty@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        Well considering they hold 15th century English church law to be above the Constitution I’m not so sure about their law degrees.