• agitatedpotato@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    The US basically has no antitrust laws anymore huh?

    Blizzard being horrifically bad at managing their business has no bearing on market share or monopoly building. That’s not suddenly okay because the last guy was an asshole.

    • Goronmon@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s hard to argue that a company can be a monopoly in an industry when they are third place in that industry (and still will be after said acquisition).

      • TimeIntegrated@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Positions change between console generations quite easily. Nintendo and Sega were battling for the crown in one generation, in the next they were far behind a newcomer. Sony absolutely dominated with the PS2 but the PS3 was dead even with the 360 the following generation.

        MS is in 3rd place because they did next to nothing this generation to get Xbox higher in the rankings except their current move of trying to buy their way into dominance.

        This is a purchase that will give MS a long term advantage. None of their competitors can really match this move because they aren’t worth 2.47 trillion USD. By allowing MS to do this the courts are signing to the world that smaller companies shouldn’t even bother competing because they can never outspend MS’s war chest.

        • Goronmon@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          None of what you said explains how Microsoft today (not 15 years ago, or in some hypothetical future) will have a monopoly before or after this acquisition.

          By allowing MS to do this the courts are signing to the world that smaller companies shouldn’t even bother competing because they can never outspend MS’s war chest.

          Which company would you have expected to compete in the console space in the foreseeable future that will have changed their minds because of this acquisition? I’m not aware of any, but I wouldn’t mind being shown that this is a real concern.

          • TimeIntegrated@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            Consoles rely on 3rd party support to be successful. MS just bought out one of the largest 3rd party publishers and will no doubt use its control over it to deny/compromise support to its competitors. This is much larger than you think. To make it worse there is no real counter play for its competitors who aren’t as flushed with cash as they are.

  • Artemis@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    What’s the general temperature on this acquisition?

    ABK has been a dumpster fire for a decade, but it seems like a worryingly large move for the gaming scene in general.

    • loobkoob@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s a weird one. I’m not really a fan of consolidation, monopolies and huge acquisitions like this in general. But at the same time, like you said, ABK is awful at the moment and I feel like things can only really improve with this deal. I also think that, of the big gaming companies, Xbox is probably the most consumer-friendly brand at the moment. Plus, selfishly, I’m a Game Pass subscriber and this benefits me, ha.

      I think, in the short-to-medium term, this merger will probably be beneficial for ABK (and its employees), Microsoft/Xbox and most consumers. In the long term, it really depends on Xbox staying benevolent.