Something on the lines of if your company facility is using over X amount of energy the majority of that has to be from a green source such as solar power. What would happen and is this feasible or am I totally thinking about this wrong

Edit: Good responses from everyone, my point in asking this was completely hypothetical, ignoring how hard it would be to implement a restriction. My own thoughts are that requiring the use of renewable energy for high electricity products could help spur the demand for it as now it’s a requirement. Of course companies would fight back, they want money

  • tristan@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    Just to expand on this, While eth is 99.99% less energy use than Bitcoin, it still added 2.8 kilotonnes of co2 last year which is equal to about 2000 average houses for a year.

    It’s a negligible amount in the scheme of things, but a lot for a virtual currency especially when you add up all the various cryptocurrencies out there.

    It wouldn’t hurt to make all the POS ones use green energy, but probably wouldn’t impact anything by itself.

    Changing Bitcoin to green energy alone probably would however.

    • FaceDeer@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      9 months ago

      Why is it “a lot for a virtual currency?” What’s the typical energy usage of a virtual currency?

      In 2019 Visa used 740,000 gigajoules of energy, which is equivalent to 6727 households (google dug up a figure of 110 Gj/year for that). So this really doesn’t seem like a lot for this kind of thing.

      • Repple (she/her)@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        9 months ago

        By your estimate, visa used 3.4x the power of eth. I would guess visa handles much much more than 3.4x the volume of currency transactions and is way more efficient on energy.

        • JimmyMcGill@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          9 months ago

          The thing that everyone misses in these comparisons is that yes that’s the energy that VISA expended to make these transactions but for a crypto currency the energy use isn’t even to make the transaction. In the end each transaction is a few Bytes of data that have no difficulty getting across the world (much like this post or any comment). The energy use is so “high” because that’s is used to secure the currency. And of course that’s a much harder comparison to make but a fairer one.

          How much energy does the the banking system actually use? How much energy is used to secure the US dollar for example?

          You have to account for the entirety of it. That’s like saying that F1 doesn’t pollute all that much because they use bio fuel and the cars are very energy efficient, completely disregarding the fact that the majority of the pollution is in the constant global shipping of cars and gear, as well as R & D

        • tristan@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          9 months ago

          Ethereum did approximately 1.1m transactions a day. Visa did approximately 660m a day.

          Small difference lol

        • FaceDeer@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          9 months ago

          Probably, but Ethereum does a lot of things that Visa can’t. Visa transactions are exceedingly simple. It was just the only generally comparable thing I could think of that I could get energy figures for, do you know of any better examples?

      • GenderNeutralBro@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        And that’s just Visa.

        https://www.eia.gov/consumption/commercial/data/2012/c&e/cfm/pba4.php

        That lists the energy usage of banking and financial office space to be 18 billion kWh, or 64.8 petajoules. (About 87x that Visa figure.)

        And even that is just office space. Doesn’t factor in the manufacture, distribution, transport, storage, and disposal of physical money, or any other associated costs.

        • Overzeetop@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          17
          ·
          9 months ago

          On the flip side, global banking processes something like 5+ orders of magnitude more transactions than ETH, so even at the low end it’s 1000x more efficient than the most well known POS coin.

    • prole@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      9 months ago

      Acting like 2000 average houses is a lot of power consumption for a cryptocurrency with such an unimaginably high market cap… That’s basically a rounding error.