• lolcatnip@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    I think you mean BLE. As far as I understand it, RFID doesn’t have any particular advantage over barcodes for tracking luggage.

    • lemmyvore@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      1 year ago

      Barcodes need line of sight with scanners and close range. RFID detectors can sense tags at larger distances and just based on general proximity.

      BLE is also an option, comparison to RFID would depend on setup particularities. RFID would be the more natural choice for throwaway, recyclable stickers that just need to store a short “dumb” ID.

    • ironeagl@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      RFID is easier to read, so you could set up scanners at more places. Also easier to walk around looking for a bag and know that it’s somewhere in this pile.