The wiki link quotes a Reuters articles that states:
“The six-page dossier, seen by Reuters, alleges that some 190 UNRWA employees, including teachers, have doubled as Hamas or Islamic Jihad militants. It has names and pictures for 11 them.” That seems like no documention if they do not even have a name for 179/190 of these claimed operatives. What I am confused about is what facts have to do with “agreement or disagreement,” especially when they have all proven your initial belief incorrect and answered your query, what are facts supposed to be agreeing/disagreeing with?
Didn’t Israel provide the info to a bunch of countries about like 100 potential people? The info prompted them to pull funding…
It was twelve accused, not hundreds
UNRWA employs 13,000 people
“Israel refuses to share either its evidence or the intelligence dossier”
The American government has said that the intelligence is “highly credible” while confirming that they haven’t at all seen it
BBC Channel 4, France24, Sky News and other organizations have had a chance to review what Israel has released and concluded that they provided “no evidence” of UNRWA workers’ complicity in the Oct 7 attack
I can’t tell if you are in agreement or disagreement. Btw, the first wiki article you sent says 190 are documented. Then the rest say other things.
The wiki link quotes a Reuters articles that states: “The six-page dossier, seen by Reuters, alleges that some 190 UNRWA employees, including teachers, have doubled as Hamas or Islamic Jihad militants. It has names and pictures for 11 them.” That seems like no documention if they do not even have a name for 179/190 of these claimed operatives. What I am confused about is what facts have to do with “agreement or disagreement,” especially when they have all proven your initial belief incorrect and answered your query, what are facts supposed to be agreeing/disagreeing with?
Agree deez nuts. gottem mom