• rusticus@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Looks at instance…

    Go fuck yourself hexbear Russian apologist. US fuckery internationally did nothing to build the middle class at home any more than Putin’s war crimes are helping the Russian economy.

      • rusticus@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        They were meddling for corporate profit. And if you think corporate profit helps the middle class then I’ve got a bag full of pigshit called “trickle down economics” to sell you.

        • eatmyass [he/him]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          bruh what

          How, in your mind, was the middle class in the first world created?

          How did the great depression end?

          Did Keynesianism not rest upon massive military spending as laid out in NSC-68?

          • rusticus@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Lol. You’re conflating the MIC and multi-national corporate profits with the growth of the middle class domestically? You’ll need some sauce for your crazy ass theory. Let me know how the United Fruit Company contributed to the growth of the middle class. Did the UFC share their profits with the middle class?

            • eatmyass [he/him]@hexbear.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              TIL trickle down economics is when you do massive military spending and use it to open up new markets in the third world to private interests and then meddle in those countries’ politics constantly to keep them underdeveloped neocolonies

              bruh please tell me how you think the middle class in the first world was created. Did they all just pull themselves up by their bootstraps?

              • rusticus@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                There’s plenty of literature about the growth of the middle class in America and elsewhere and none of it talks about the United Fruit company.

    • MemesAreTheory [he/him, any]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Oh, nice whattaboutism. Didn’t say shit about Russia dumbass. What the fuck does that have to do with a conversation about the US engaging in direct imperialism during the 20th century? You sick fucks are obsessed with Russia, it’s kind of cute. Like you’ve got a crush or something.

      My guy I’m just talking about well recorded history here. Go Google operation Condor, or if you’re really feeling adventurous, literally any history book about Latin America. US violence and meddling is a core part of what gave the country a deeply unfair advantage. There was only dramatic reduction in poverty and a “growing middle class” because we were actively preventing that from developing abroad. Pretending foreign policy and domestic issues are separate realms is completely juvenile. Look at OPEC for the easiest example in the world.

      • rusticus@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Are you actually arguing a right wing talking point? Do you think the profits of a giant corporation help the middle class? That’s called trickle down economics and it’s total bullshit.

        • MemesAreTheory [he/him, any]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          What no theory does to a mf.

          No, this isn’t trickle down economics. It’s called superprofit/super exploitation, a marxist concept. The West™ in general, but a few powers specifically (subject of our discussion here, the USA in particular) have enforced extremely brutal oppression in the global South. This has kept the global South from developing competitive or even self-sufficient industry and reliant on imports. This gives American firms a massively unfair advantage, one which is used to placate the American working class so they don’t develop solidarity with the global South. Throw in some bog standard racism and you’ve got a stable empire of misery. It’s classic divide and conquer tactics, same used to pit managers/white collar workers and more blue collar or service workers against each other. Let some people feel superior to others, and they’ll be so busy looking down they won’t mind the boot on their back standing above them.

          There’s a rich body of theory here (which you are plainly ignorant of) but I would recommend reading about the phenomenon of unequal exchange by Jason Hickel

          https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S095937802200005X

          It’s a good starting place for understanding how wealth is extracted from the south for the north.

          Unfortunately for all of us, Capitalism has a long-term rate of profit problem. Even with super exploitation profit falls in the long run. To maintain their power and the rate of profit the capitalists begin ripping out and further oppressing the once (relatively) privileged working class of the north too. That’s why social safety nets are being torn to shreds and constantly under attack, and gains in quality of life/life expectancy have either stalled or regressed in so called “rich” countries.

          We say “workers of the world unite” for a reason. It’s a global struggle.

    • Gorillatactics [none/use name]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      America got all those bombs from a genie lamp, definitely no large scale industry that helped factory workers secure a middle class existence. The treats they consumed had nothing to do with the destitution their government caused in the third world either. The US did not overthrow a government at the behest of a banana company.

      • rusticus@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Please show us all where the profits of a giant corporation (United Fruit Company) from deposing President Arbenz in 1954 helped the middle class in America.

        It only helped the profits of a giant corporation. Wait, are you using a right wing talking point that giant corporate profits help the middle class? That’s called trickle down economics and it’s been debunked for years.