• OpenStars@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    9 months ago

    Yeah I was like WTF? It reads to me like “non-union workers lose their jobs while union ones don’t”, but then they had to somehow manufacture drama for the sake of more drama so they could add drama to their drama, when no drama needed to exist in the first place?

    Fuck the for-profit media:-(.

    • ZooGuru@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      9 months ago

      Yeah for sure. To me it sounds like “hey, non-union employees. You better be pushing union employees to accept less or we will just cut your jobs”. The headline alone feels very much like a threat.

      • Patches@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        Again you have to view the source. It’s Forbes.

        The entire point of Forbes and most media these days - is to sow discontent in the class war. It is one of the many weapons of the billionaire class.

        • OpenStars@startrek.website
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          9 months ago

          This is Fortune though - please forgive my ignorance, but is that like a known subsidiary of Forbes or something? I searched for the word “Forbes” on the page and found nothing.

          Anyway, perhaps we need a community that displays news articles while excluding such known shills. While we are at it, ditch click-bait articles too:-).

          The problem there is that there likely would be next to nothing left!