• Doug Holland@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    100
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    The officers’ counterclaim alleges Galanakis defamed them and invaded and their privacy when he posted to social media a series of police body-camera videos documenting his arrest and appended to those videos his own commentary on the incident.

    Unfuckingbelievable.

    • sharpiemarker@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      32
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Defamation is apparently when you get caught being an ass on camera, and someone puts that video of your actions on the internet.

  • flossdaily@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    52
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Yeah, that’ll never hold up. That doesn’t even come into the ballpark of defamation.

    • themeatbridge@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      37
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Seems like the judge is allowing the countersuit to proceed on the one narrow statement that Winters had been “convicted” of domestic abuse for beating his girlfriend. In actuality, Newton Police Officer Nathan Winters had orders of protection entered and extended several times because he was beating his girlfriend. Winters has not been convicted of domestic abuse, so the statement could be considered defamatory, and that’s why it wasn’t immediately dismissed with the rest of the claims.

      • Doug Holland@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Sounds like you know what you’re talking about, and I don’t — doesn’t defamation have to be ‘intentional’? Sounds like, at worst, a misstatement that can be rewinded with a published correction.

        • thepianistfroggollum@lemmynsfw.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          30
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Exactly. You have to knowingly or negligently provide false information for it to be defamation. A kid not knowing that a restraining order doesn’t equal a conviction should be neither.

          They also have to prove that the statements caused actual damages.

        • luciferofastora@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          16
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          If I’m reading this right, this is what the countersuit would have to prove. Basically, the grounds would be “Yeah, he did say something untrue, so now I’ll let you try to prove that he did so intentionally”

    • Bleeping Lobster@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      31
      ·
      1 year ago

      Police are bastards, but we might want to check the article out before switching to outrage mode

      As part of his social-media postings, Galanakis made several statements, alleging he “basically got kidnapped then raped by the NPD all night,” and falsely indicating Winters had been “convicted” of domestic abuse for beating up a girlfriend.

      So it’s not the posting of the video w/ commentary that they’re saying it’s defamatory, it’s claiming he was ‘raped’ and the false domestic abuse accusation. Stupid teen was in an excellent position for compensation but he’s probably wrecked his chances with statements like that.

      • JudCrandall@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        35
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Try reading the article before you start polishing those boots.

        As for the city’s complaint that Galanakis claimed to have been “kidnapped then raped,” Judge Locher found that statement was a clear and allowable expression of opinion and rhetorical hyperbole.

          • JudCrandall@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            10
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Lol I don’t know, man. Your post was very “hey fellow kids, the po-po are total bastards BUT you also need to read the article to see why they’re right” and then you rushed to defend them. Without reading the article. Which you were chiding people for not doing.

            Edit 2 seconds later: you also called Galanakis a “stupid teen” which makes me think you’re probably in the wrong community.

            • Bleeping Lobster@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              7
              ·
              1 year ago

              I used a descriptor, so what. If he was a grown man who gobbed off on social media before he finished his court case, I’d have called him a stupid man. And, you don’t get to tell me what community I can be in, thanks. I haven’t broken any rules. Finally, I’m not defending anyone, just pointing out why they were counter-claiming.

              I can see why people didn’t like my comment, fair enough. But I’m not a bootlicker or police supporter for adding info I thought others had missed. We all make mistakes from time to time.

              • JudCrandall@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                5
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                If you made a mistake just say that and dip.

                I used a descriptor, so what. If he was a grown man who gobbed off on social media before he finished his court case, I’d have called him a stupid man.

                Except he’s not stupid. The only reason we’re talking about this is because he brought attention to it and fought back against a corrupt institution by posting it on social media.

                “I’m not a bootlicker!” says the dude whose mouth is full of boot.

  • Hegar@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    52
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    With regard Galanakis’ claim that Winters had been convicted of domestic abuse, the judge noted that specific allegation appeared to based on a 2021 protective order … which was extended on at least three subsequent occasions.

    Galanakis argued that under Iowa law, a protective order was close enough to a conviction to make his statement substantially true. Judge Locher disagreed, noting that a criminal conviction is very different from a civil judgment and carries a higher burden of proof.

    Teenager sued for slander for claiming that the officer who wrongly arrested him was convicted of beating his girlfriend. Really, officer winters had just been civilly judged for beating his girlfriend.

    It’s always so sad to see how much slander hardworking domestic abusers face - just let them get back to policing our country!