• Maggoty@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    114
    arrow-down
    18
    ·
    1 month ago

    This morning I could hardly find a headline to confirm Israel invaded Lebanon. Everything was about how scary Iran is.

    What the fucking fuckery fuck media? How is Iran’s response to Israel’s invasion more important than Israel invading? I shouldn’t have to dig for 20 minutes to confirm something like that.

    • Soulg@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      48
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      I saw plenty of headlines about the invasion of Lebanon. It just happened first, so the newer headlines would be about the thing that just happened

      • Maggoty@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        34
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        1 month ago

        These things happened hours apart. And many of the stubs behind the Iran headlines made no mention of why they would fire missiles at Israel. After today I won’t be surprised when we start getting people in here who think Iran fired for no reason and Israel hasn’t invaded Lebanon. It was an absolute failure of news media.

        • Soulg@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          I’m not defending the media by any stretch, just that both events got some coverage.

          • Maggoty@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            9
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 month ago

            Yeah I’m just mad because they know the timing matters. They know the words they use matter. We’ve heard them talk about this exact kind of failing in the Iraq war and covering Trump. And now we’re right back there again, breathlessly repeating the administration and their ally. Calling it a “limited ground operation”. They know that first impression matters and there’s a whole group of people who now think Israel got rocketed for terrorist hunting.

          • EatATaco@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            13
            ·
            1 month ago

            It’s called moving the goalposts. You called out their Bs claim, so they just threw out another one.

            Anyone can go and listen to npr up first. The title for yesterday includes “Israel escalates in Lebanon” and then today they point to Israel vowing repercussions for Iran. In the podcast itself, they talk about how this was almost certainly retaliation for the killing for the Hezbollah leader.

            This whole idea that the whole of western media is ignoring what Israel is typical of the false Bs pushed by the op.

            • Maggoty@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              6
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              1 month ago

              So it’s an “escalation” and retaliation for something else entirely.

              You realize this fits the exact outline I’ve laid out? Anything to avoid pointing out Israel has invaded the sovereign territory of another country.

              And no. I haven’t moved any goalposts.

              • EatATaco@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                5
                arrow-down
                4
                ·
                1 month ago

                You realize this fits the exact outline I’ve laid out?

                Your main claims were the all of the headlines “about how scary Iran is” (the fact that it was a headline about Israel escalating and Israel vowing repercussions) and “many of the stubs behind the Iran headlines made no mention of why they would fire missiles at Israel” (and the short story in NPR was about why they were retaliating). It directly contradicts it, using one of the most popular and prominent US news organizations.

                And no. I haven’t moved any goalposts.

                Your original argument was that there were no headlines, which the other poster challenged. . .you then went not to say that the stories didn’t give information about why they retaliated. It’s absolutely a clear case of moving the goal posts.

                Attempting to gaslighting me won’t work, sorry. We’ve had too many interactions before for me not to be on the lookout for disingenuous positions.

                • Maggoty@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  6
                  arrow-down
                  4
                  ·
                  1 month ago

                  It’s not gaslighting, it’s two people talking about the news environment they experienced yesterday morning. You’re the one trying to make it awkward and accusing people of operating in bad faith. I know what I saw and you’re not going to bully me into having seen what you say was there.

            • YeetPics@mander.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              7
              arrow-down
              7
              ·
              1 month ago

              Hey, how dare you oppose my blatant false pretense with facts that are verifiable!

              -Ozma before he downvoted you

        • Blackmist@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          Read better media. And it’s not like the BBC is particularly progressive on this.

    • Prunebutt@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      1 month ago

      Sounds like something an antisemite would say! Why do you hate jews instead of the barbarian brown people, antisemite?

      /s

    • KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      to be clear, the iran government is basically oil backed terrorism and human rights abuses. Yeah fuck iran.

      I wouldn’t trust a single thing iran says.

  • twinnie@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    49
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    I don’t know if things are different in the US but I haven’t seen much indifference to the bombing of Palestine. I’ve seen an awful lot of mention of children killed, etc.

    • rockSlayer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      1 month ago

      The republican party is pushing bills through the lower branch that enshrine real antisemitism through Zionism. That’s where US media and politics are at regarding the genocide.

    • pjwestin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      They’re somewhat different. Our news media doesn’t properly question our security agencies (they basically stopped doing this after 9/11), and Israel is our strongest Middle East alley, so they tend to present the Israeli narrative of the war with little or no scrutiny. That being said, given the sheer amount of destruction and death caused by the Israeli bombings, our media really can’t ignore the suffering of the Palestinians this time. They’re still far too deferential to Israel’s justification for the suffering, but they’re not ignoring.

    • UnityDevice@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      1 month ago

      Have you heard about them bombing Lebanon yesterday though, or even for the last few months? It got a passing mention and only in the context of “this might cause Iran to respond”. And there’s a few more flags on that picture.

    • NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      This depends a lot on where you are. This is a heavily partisan issue so you’ll likely find rural Republicans who haven’t seen many people IRL who have issues with the bombing of Palestine.

    • Soulg@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      1 month ago

      Its different from European coverage yes, but it’s also not even remotely similar to what people like ozma keep claiming it is. The Palestine issue is being talked about CONSTANTLY, just perhaps still not with enough urgency. They then just hyperbolize it into shit like this “meme”

    • EatATaco@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 month ago

      The beauty of not consuming any main stream media is that it can have said or not said anything you want to confirm your beliefs.

  • Adderbox76@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    39
    ·
    1 month ago

    Because the entire western world seemingly has to tip toe around Israel and let them get away with whatever they want because of some collective shame and empathy Europe and America still feel for something that happened before most people in Israel today were ever born…

    The holocaust was bad…yeah. But the fact that that tragedy somehow gives the state of Israel an unlimited pass in perpetuity to be assholes is just wrong.

    • rottingleaf@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 month ago

      The holocaust was used as something with which it was somehow immoral to compare other genocides in the 00s. Thus as a tool to make those more acceptable, cause no ongoing genocide can be as bad as the holocaust, or so pro-Israeli organizations say.

      That was its only role.

      While the David&Goliath narrative in the 70s and 80s was used to make Israel infallible in public opinion, paving the path for Israeli intelligence widely penetrating western governments and structures.

      But even this wouldn’t be critical, if not for the West becoming more authoritarian gradually. Notice how the ruling structures in the West have been becoming less and less mobile, the key figures fewer and fewer, less and less transparent, and also older and older, and the concepts of right, law, constitutional law, common sense and natural right fuzzier and weaker, surrendering the reality to fallback mechanisms - as in raw power.

      The less transparent a structure is, the easier it can be controlled by blackmail, personal interests and deals that the public wouldn’t want if it knew about them.

      Say, about USSR in the 80s - the stereotypic picture of it being some geriatric non-transparent bureacratic warmongering state with fascist policies and degrading society, - it’s correct. The problem is - it just aged faster. The West was simply late by a couple decades. Those components of USSR’s collapse were not conditioned by totalitarian communism in any way. Just in the West late boomers are in power, while USSR was ruled by the last pre-war generation.

      Israel is just one symptom.

      So this can’t be solved by any conformism, arguing by the rules, proving things in courts, voting in elections. Only by bravery, strength and taking responsibility backed only by what you want and your own decision, no law, rule or vote.

    • GeneralInterest@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      Same I think. Here in the UK the main two TV news channels (BBC and Sky) have extensively reported on deaths and suffering in Gaza, and now they are reporting on the situation in Lebanon

      Of course there are also right-wing papers (Telegraph, Express) who give the impression that Israel is always good and everybody else is always bad, but they’re just one segment of the overall media

    • mlg@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 month ago

      The funny thing is AP is actually also a primary source distributor, so they actually provide their reporting to thousands of media outlets so they can report the details. Unfortunately, because news outlets these days are focused on profits, we get stuff like this:

      Kinda stupid when you consider more people probably read NYT than AP and Reuters combined, despite it being a secondary source. Or they go watch/read even more biased things on stuff like Fox.

      • TexMexBazooka@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        All but one of those articles are a decade old, and they’re all op-eds, not news articles per se.

      • Godric@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        Don’t be mad when opinion articles express peoples opinions. All the other shown articles are a decade old and/or opinion articles. There is room to complain, so why not do it accurately?

  • MrMakabar@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 month ago

    Israel and Iran going for a real war, would make the currently bad situation even worse. However it does come with the advantage that both countries might get rid of their shitty leaders.

    • Maggoty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      32
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 month ago

      I don’t think that’s true. Because Biden won’t be able to resist. We’ll have US troops on the ground and he’ll still be saying Hamas is blocking the peace process.

    • NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      1 month ago

      Israel and Iran going for a real war, would make the currently bad situation even worse.

      For who? It’ll create more bad situations, but the currently bad situation in Palestine will get better, if anything. I know everyone is afraid of an all out war in the Middle East but in the long term it’s one possible way to collapse the status quo and make way for a more sustainable future for the region. War is bad, but it’s not worse than a warmonger getting to steamroll everyone else and Israel needs to regain the fear of God (and their neighbors) before there’s ever a chance for peace. Egypt and Syria proved it in opposite directions in 1973.

      Edit: A weaker Iran would also help countries like Lebanon and Iran gain some real independence (and turn the tide against Assad); they’re definitely not sinless here.

      • MrMakabar@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        1 month ago

        There are anti war protests in Israel against Netanyahu since Hamas attack on the October 7th. As soon as the fighting ends an new election will be called and Netanyahu is probably going to loose that one. That would mean a more moderate government for Israel and the chance for a deal with the PLO. However a war with Iran delays this and we know what is going on in Palestine right now.

        A weaker Iran might help, but the way of getting rid of Iran as a problem is a revolution within Iran. I doubt a war against Israel would help with that.

        • NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          There are anti war protests in Israel against Netanyahu since Hamas attack on the October 7th.

          Yes, but not for the reasons you think. The overwhelming majority of Israelis have absolutely no issue with the violence being inflicted upon Palestinians (I can link a source). The right wing keeps growing in Israel, and was even before the war. The protests are happening because even as a genocidal fascist Netanyahu is failing in the Israeli goal of destroying Hamas’s ability to wage war (surprise surprise) and bringing the hostages home (more surprise). The government that comes after this won’t have Likud, but it’ll still be a far right one. Settlements will keep getting built, we’ll still have people like “I consider my life’s mission to be preventing the creation of a Palestinian state” Smotrich, Gazans will still be forced to live in an open air concentration camp, etc etc. A deal with the PLO is fucking impossible, both because Israel won’t get a more moderate government and because the PLO is dead. Mahmoud Abbas is a corrupt Israeli puppet and everyone knows it; even Biden admits the PLO will need to be reformed before they can be trusted to run anything.

          TL;DR: Even after the next election, don’t expect any good faith peace action from Israel. It won’t happen; we’ve seen this movie before.

          A weaker Iran might help, but the way of getting rid of Iran as a problem is a revolution within Iran. I doubt a war against Israel would help with that.

          I mean if they’re weakened by the war they won’t be able to give as much Hezbollah and Syria weapons. That has to count for something.

        • jaybone@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          1 month ago

          Are they able to delay elections based on the status of their military engagements? That’s seems like a big problem with their democracy…

          • MrMakabar@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            1 month ago

            No elections are scheduled to be held in October 2026, but the coaltion is very likely going to break as soon as the war ends.

  • Nuke_the_whales@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    Replace the Israeli flag on top with an American flag and t this is more accurate. Americans moralizing about invasions and unjust wars lol

  • iAvicenna@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    because when it is done against white people, fear mongering works better in western countries. also lobbies

  • Yareckt@lemmynsfw.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    1 month ago

    I beg to differ. Channel 4 News is one of the media outlets that is more critical of Israel then any other media I know of while still beeing focused on facts. I can only recommend it though if you are prepared to see dead bodies and utterly despaired people who just lost family members.

    • rockSlayer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      31
      arrow-down
      14
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      Ozma is anything but a troll. They’re highly consistent in their political beliefs, and generally knows the topics they post about. Not everyone you disagree with is a troll or a foreign agent.

      • The Snark Urge@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        1 month ago

        Who said anything about foreign agents? But you do seem to have a sense of my objections to their agenda. Anyone who posts so prolifically will at any rate have thick enough skin to tolerate being misunderstood.

        • return2ozma@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          1 month ago

          Gurrrll I’ve been through the 2016 election Twitter wars and 11 years on Reddit. Nothing phases me anymore. I’m numb.

  • YeetPics@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    1 month ago

    Imagine feeling the urge to back either side of this thousand-year conflict and also screaming about your moral superiority in doing so.

    Stop supporting monsters.

    🤡

    • Altofaltception@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 month ago

      Please provide references and evidence of conflict spanning back a thousand years. The conflict started after the Ottoman Empire collapsed and the region got divided up in a colonial experiment by the French and British.

      • KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 month ago

        believe it or not sometimes people do a little bit of hyperbole and exaggeration.

        I would never do that, not in a million years. It’s literally impossible.

      • Madison420@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 month ago

        Huh? The conflict is at least as old as 1834 (Ottoman empire fell in 1922) and they’ve been trading blows since well before that.

          • Madison420@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            29 days ago

            Secretarian religious violence in Israel with proto Israeli terrorists involved. Notably the order issued to murder any Muslim found in Hebron. Many families were removed and would never return with proto Israeli Jews taking “abandoned” property and refusing to relinquish it to this day.

            It’s a very very old territorial and secretarian conflict, trying to imply it’s summer limited modern engagement lacks nuance and is at best myopic.

            • Altofaltception@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              29 days ago

              Palestine was a territory of the Ottoman Empire at the time. Israel did not exist.

              From what I can gather online there was a peasant revolt, but nothing sectarian about it. The Ottomans pillaged the villages during and after the revolt.

  • NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    1 month ago

    Small corrections: Iran launched missiles from their home soil; those weren’t airstrikes. Unfortunately Israel’s air force is unparalleled in the Middle East.