Access to this page has been denied
thehill.com
px-captcha
  • JaggedRobotPubes@lemmy.worldEnglish
    18·
    13 hours ago

    If he actually thought he won he’d jump at the chance to get the free publicity.

    Well, reach out with little grabby hands and trip slightly forward, in his case.

  • azimir@lemmy.ml
    32·
    16 hours ago

    Trump is a coward. He’s a schoolyard bully coward. He got punched in the last debate so he’s crying foul in the corner.

  • wake_up@lemmy.world
    1·
    8 hours ago

    Oh man, another debate would be something, wouldn’t it? I totally get what Harris is going for here. Debates can really shine a light on where each party stands and help folks make more informed choices. Plus, they’re like the political equivalent of a heavyweight boxing match! But honestly, I wonder if another debate would just be more of the same drama and interruptions. What do you think? Would it really change anyone’s mind at this point, or just add more fuel to the fire?

    • Dkarma@lemmy.world
      2·
      5 hours ago

      After the last one there’s nothing else trump could do to alienate voters. Eating pets was the cherry

      Kamala is saying let’s do it again because

      1. Trump never will

      2. It gets under his skin and drives him mad cuz deep down he knows he lost the last one to her.

      Saying it is a win win. Doing the debate may not actually be if she screws it up or has a snafu.

  • Stern@lemmy.world
    12·
    16 hours ago

    If Vance gets absolutely demolished, which by all available evidence seems to be likely, Trump will clamor for another debate to try and fix things. If its middling, probably not.

    • FuglyDuck@lemmy.worldEnglish
      17·
      16 hours ago

      Walz gonna lead with a backhanded “thanks for coming, I know it’s hard to make time to get off the couch.”