• jarfil@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Not sure if it was in an article or on TV, but at some point there was a map showing Starlink coverage over Ukraine, and how it faded towards the borders in order to go down to zero in the conflict areas. Obviously the moment Ukrainian forces started to push, they went into the blackout areas and were SOL.

    Regarding the DoD agreement… I’m not sure where I’ve read it, but apparently he asked the DoD to foot the bill for Starlink around the end of 2022… and then when the agreement was drafted and they were about to pay for it, he decided that “nah”, he’d follow providing the service for free. I highly suspect that was a weasel way to negotiate better terms and/or amount, knowing that the DoD needed a contract to hold him accountable, and that they were actually willing to pay.

    You’re not wrong in not trusting the guy, nobody should; according to his recent biography, he seems to take everything as a big game with the main objective of making more money.

    • spaghettiwestern@sh.itjust.worksOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      What I find especially disturbing about this entire scenario is that Musk is literally choosing to protect the Russian war machine instead of the people who are being attacked - including seniors, women, infants and children. Taking steps to protect an aggressor while actively preventing a country from defending its non-combatant citizens from unprovoked attacks is just plain evil.

      I expect Musk will have a movie made about him someday. It won’t be flattering.