Some interesting stuff here, including links to more studies showing similar results in different countries.

The summary is that the reason motorists break more laws is that speeding is so common.

I don’t think this is because motorists are all evil and cyclists are all saints. Probably, the reason motorists break speed limits is that it can be relatively difficult to keep cars below the speed limit. It’s all too easy to absentmindedly speed up. It’s also, perhaps becuase of this, widely seen as socially acceptable to break the speed limit (speaking anecdotally).

One interesting thing here, which may not surprise regular readers of Fuck Cars, is that better cycling infrastructure leads to less lawbreaking by cyclists. As is often the case, it’s the design of roads and cities that changes behaviour, not abstract appeals to road users to be sensible!

    • Hawke@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Not in all cases, e.g. the “Idaho stop” or laws that allow cycling on the sidewalk or proceeding on red light after a delay.

      • pjhenry1216@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        You’re mentioning extra laws that still need to be followed. They just replaced other vehicular laws. They’re still able to be broken.

        • Hawke@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yes but they are not “the same rules of the road”; they are different rules for bikes vs cars.

          • pjhenry1216@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            They’re a fairly small subset and still very easy to break though. All of those laws you mentioned would be broken if someone absent mindedly wasn’t paying attention.

            • Hawke@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              I’m really not sure how you’d go about breaking the Idaho stop law. Stopping when you didn’t really need to?

              Regardless the point is that cyclists do not need to follow the same rules of the road as cars do.

              • pjhenry1216@kbin.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                Regardless, that’s not the same as saying they’re not as strict which is what I was replying to.

                Idaho stop is broken the same way a car not following a yield sign is broken. It’s still really easy and one of the most common complaint about cyclists to begin with.

    • 4am@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      In my experience, there are plenty of cyclists out there (and I’m sure it’s not the majority, but enough for me to notice) who are “traffic” when it suits them, and also “pedestrians” when it suits them.

      Mostly, bike messengers in Boston are dicks. 😅

      • pjhenry1216@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        That’s just describing the cyclists who break rules though. It doesn’t mean they are required to follow fewer laws.

      • pjhenry1216@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        Says the troll who didn’t even read the headline of the post before posting just because they saw a car and cycle in the same picture.

        Beyond that, I responded to each of their points. If you want a source, ask them to provide them and I will give a rebuttal. I responded to the amount of information they provided. I didn’t see you asking them for a source, but you already have shown you’re obviously biased and don’t actually care about real discussion. Otherwise you wouldn’t just interject an opinion into a topic without even knowing what’s being discussed.